**Session Date/Time:** 13 Jan 2026 15:00 # [SCHC](../wg/schc.html) ## Summary The SCHC Working Group held its first interim meeting of 2026. Key discussions included the progress of several drafts, with a strong focus on moving the RFC 8824 Update and the SCHC Protocol Number drafts towards completion. A Working Group Last Call was decided for the RFC 8824 Update. The new "Chiclet" draft, proposing a modular approach to SHIC functionality, was introduced and will be proposed for Working Group adoption. The group also discussed the status of other drafts and the logistics for IETF 125. ## Key Discussion Points * **Welcome and Notewells**: The meeting started with standard IETF notewells and a reminder regarding IPR. * **Progress of SCHC Protocol Number Draft (v06)**: * The draft progressed from version 04 to 06, incorporating reviews from Carles, Marco, and Pascal. * A request for a code point for CCSDS at IANA for the "IP extension" was incorporated, with text provided by Marc Blanchet. * Pascal noted the need for more reviews to safely complete the Working Group Last Call (WGLC), specifically mentioning Quentin, Marion, and Laurent. * A significant concern was raised regarding the UDP port number's explanation and justification. Pascal stressed the need for clearer text on its purpose, usage (e.g., in multi-session scenarios, or interaction with multi-point compression), and why it is required for transport layer stakeholders. * Alexander agreed to review the UDP port number section more closely. * **Progress of RFC 8824 Update Draft**: * Marco reported a new version (dated December 1st) addresses the two remaining actions from the Montreal meeting. * The authors believe the document is ready for WGLC. Marco also suggested informing the CoRE Working Group due to the document's topic. * The chairs agreed to initiate a WGLC. * The group acknowledged the need to find a shepherd for the document; Carles was suggested, but concerns were raised as he is an author of the draft. No immediate shepherd was identified. * **ICMPv6 Compression Document**: * The document has expired. * Action was identified to contact the authors (Laurent and Dominique) to resubmit a new version so that a WGLC can be initiated. * **SCHC over PPP Draft**: * The draft is currently on hold, awaiting progression and stability of the main SCHC architectural document to ensure proper alignment, particularly concerning the proposed PPP code for SHIC session indication. * **SCHC Architecture Document**: * Reference was made to a "minimum architecture" document by Mario and Quentin (who were not present at this interim). * Discussion was held on how to advance this work, with suggestions for a "tiger team" or "design team" for concentrated effort. * It was noted that there weren't enough participants on the call to make a definitive decision, and the item would be added to the agenda for the next meeting. * **IETF 125 (Shenzhen) Participation**: * The chairs inquired about in-person attendance for IETF 125. Most participants indicated they would not be attending in person, with Marco planning to attend online. * The chairs decided to send an email to the working group to formally gauge participation interest for organizing hybrid attendance. * **Chiclet Document (New Draft v2)**: * Alexander presented the "Chiclet" document, which now includes Marion and Quentin as co-authors. * **Concept**: Chiclet proposes a formal definition of self-contained, specific SHIC functionality, akin to a "screwdriver" from a "Swiss army knife" – a lightweight, focused part of the full SHIC framework. This concept was motivated by specific needs, such as those from DIA-TSP, for a subset of SHIC functionality. * **Characteristics**: A Chiclet implements a specific SHIC operation, operates with fixed or configurable parameters, and crucially, must be fully interoperable with a full SHIC implementation using its specific configuration. * **Progress**: The draft received positive feedback at IETF 124 in Montreal from industrial participants and a positive review from Quentin on the mailing list. * **Next Steps**: The document is considered straightforward and mature. Alexander suggested it is ready for Working Group adoption. The addition of a YANG definition for Chiclet configuration could be considered if deemed necessary later. * Pascal expressed support for adoption, provided active involvement from Marion and Quentin is confirmed, which Alexander affirmed. ## Decisions and Action Items **Decisions:** * **RFC 8824 Update Draft**: The Working Group will initiate a Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for this document. * **Chiclet Draft**: The chairs will initiate a call for Working Group adoption for the "Chiclet" draft on the mailing list. **Action Items:** * **Alexander**: * Initiate the Working Group Last Call for the RFC 8824 Update draft. * Contact the authors of the ICMPv6 Compression document (Laurent and Dominique) to resubmit an updated version. * Review the UDP port number section of the SCHC Protocol Number draft for improved clarity and justification. * **Chairs**: * Send an email to the Working Group to assess interest and plans for attending IETF 125 in Shenzhen. * Add the discussion on advancing the SCHC Architecture document (e.g., forming a tiger team) to the agenda for the next interim meeting. * **Pascal**: * Initiate the call for Working Group adoption of the "Chiclet" draft on the mailing list. * **Working Group**: * Individuals are encouraged to provide further reviews for the SCHC Protocol Number draft, especially regarding the UDP port number justification. ## Next Steps * The chairs will proceed with the action items, including initiating WGLCs and calls for adoption as decided. * The group looks forward to increased participation at the next interim meeting.