Markdown Version | Session Recording
Session Date/Time: 24 Jul 2023 18:30
rsab
Summary
This meeting covered several important topics including where RSAB keeps its records, changes to the data tracker, and addressing broken links in RFCs. A significant portion of the meeting focused on clarifying the relationship between the RSAB, RSWG, and RFC Production Center, particularly concerning policy decisions and their implementation.
Key Discussion Points
- RSAB Records: Discussed the location for RSAB records, with a preference for using the data tracker to store decisions and statements. A wiki for internal procedures was considered but ultimately deferred in favor of exploring the data tracker's capabilities.
- Data Tracker Changes: The ISG requested a change to the data tracker to require secretariat intervention for new revisions of approved drafts. This was discussed and generally supported.
- Policy vs. Operational Issues: Addressed the difficulties faced by the RPC in distinguishing between policy and operational issues and determining the appropriate venue for resolution. A proposal was made for the RPC to initially consult with the RSAB for guidance on issue routing.
- Broken Links in RFCs: Explored the problem of broken links in older RFCs and potential solutions, including using the Errata system. The discussion focused on prioritizing normative references and automating link replacement where possible.
- GitHub Experiments: Stream managers are agreeable on the use of GitHub and potentially using more documents for experimentation so that they can provide more input a particular process.
Decisions and Action Items
- RSAB Records: Confirm consensus on the mailing list to use the data tracker for storing decisions and statements.
- Data Tracker Changes: Implement the ISG's requested change to the data tracker, requiring secretariat intervention for new revisions of approved drafts.
- Broken Links in RFCs:
- Alexis to conduct homework about the issue, including identifying the number of broken links in normative references, and explore potential ways to automatically replace broken links.
- Alexis to determine how many broken links there are in the IAB stream.
- Alexis to talk to rest for research analysis and standards process to determine if there were previously any scripts written to resolve/find broken links.
Next Steps
- Continue the discussion on resolving broken links in RFCs based on findings and further investigation.
- Attend and participate in the session that will take place on Thursday concerning new GitHub processes.