Markdown Version | Session Recording
Session Date/Time: 09 Nov 2023 16:00
rtgarea
Summary
The Routing Area meeting covered several key topics, including updates from Area Directors, a report on the Routing Area Director (RAD) function, and a discussion about agenda item inclusion criteria for working group meetings. Sue Harris presented insights from her PhD dissertation on leadership in standards organizations and the IESG.
Key Discussion Points
- Area Director Updates: Area Directors welcomed a new LSR co-chair (Jing Jin Koo) and an interim MPLS chair (Adrian Farrell). They emphasized the smooth operation of working groups in the area.
- Routing Area Director (RAD) Update: RAD co-chair Daniel Enriquez provided a report on document reviews, reviewer assignments, and upcoming process improvements. Key areas of focus: Improving turnaround time for reviews, and streamlining the accept/reject process for reviewers.
- Working Group Agenda Item Inclusion Criteria: Discussion centered on a proposal to require mailing list discussion prior to a draft appearing on a working group agenda. The goals are to ensure more participants have read and considered documents before in-person discussions and to improve efficiency in the limited face-to-face time. A number of exceptions were discussed.
- Author List Length: A lengthy discussion occurred regarding author lists on drafts. Suggestions included removing the existing limit, and having a tracked history of who contributed text to documents. Concerns were raised about motivations for adding authors (bonuses, corporate support vs. actual contribution) and related impacts to credibility.
- Sue Harris Presentation: Sue Harris presented research on effective IESG leadership and dynamics, sharing insights on data-driven measures, the importance of solidarity, and the need for ADs to act as good managers and inspiring leaders.
Decisions and Action Items
- RAD Process Improvement: Daniel Enriquez to follow up with reviewers to ensure timely acknowledgment (accept/reject) of document review assignments. If no response within 7 days, the document will be reassigned.
- WG Agenda Item Inclusion Guidelines: The Area Directors will refine the proposal for working group agenda item inclusion criteria based on the discussion, with the understanding that it should be a guideline and not a strict rule. They will engage with working group chairs in a follow-up discussion. Some changes to the wording of the guidelines should be considered around items such as 'new drafts' and external presentations.
- Action Items regarding author list length: ADs to consider and follow up on all feedback and suggestions.
- Tooling: Check for better data tracker tooling to notify users via email of new LSR drafts
Next Steps
- Area Directors to schedule a working group chairs chat to further discuss the agenda item inclusion proposal.
- Area Directors to discuss data tracker updates for tracking LSR drafts.
- Area Directors to discuss any potential updates to the draft author guidelines.